What is the protocol when there is a senior military or civilian accused of a crime?

In situations where a senior military or civilian is accused of a crime, notifying the Judge Advocate General (JAG) is the appropriate protocol. JAG plays a critical role within the military justice system, and their involvement is essential for ensuring that the legal processes are followed correctly and that the rights of all parties are protected. They provide legal advice on how to proceed with the case, assess the nature of the allegations, and determine the proper course of action based on military law.

Engaging JAG also allows for an examination of any potential implications for military discipline and the impact on the command structure. This step ensures that any investigation or legal proceedings are conducted in accordance with established laws and regulations, maintaining order and justice within the military environment.

The other choices range from inadequate to inappropriate responses to such serious allegations. Notifying local law enforcement may not be the first step in a military context, as military personnel often follow their internal procedures. Ignoring the accusations undermines the severity of the situation and could allow potential misconduct to continue unaddressed. Similarly, proceeding with an immediate trial would disregard due process and the necessary investigation that JAG would facilitate.