True or False: Written statements can be used in court as evidence of what was told to investigators.

Prepare for the Master-at-Arms C School Block 6 Test. Refine your knowledge with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Understand important topics with hints and explanations. Gear up for your exam!

The assertion that written statements can be used in court as evidence of what was told to investigators is generally false. Written statements are often considered hearsay if they are being used to prove the truth of the matter asserted in those statements. Hearsay is typically not admissible in court unless it meets certain exceptions. For written statements to be admissible, they often need to comply with rules of evidence that may require direct testimony from the individual who made the statement, or they must fall under a recognized exception to the hearsay rule.

Moreover, the nature of the written statement plays a role in its admissibility. For instance, if the statement is not made under oath or if it lacks credibility, it may further weaken its standing as evidence. In certain jurisdictions, specific rules may apply that can affect whether or not written statements are allowed as evidence. Therefore, it's essential to consult the local laws and evidence rules to determine their admissibility in a particular case.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy